News

Vardy v Rooney: Rebekah Vardy had ‘no choice’ but to take Coleen Rooney to court, says lawyer

football merchandise
The Official Football Merchandise Store

Rebekah Vardy has suffered “immense distress” as a result of Coleen Rooney’s now infamous “Wagatha Christie” allegations and “had no choice” but to take her to court “to establish her innocence and vindicate her reputation”, the High Court has been told.

Vardy is suing Rooney after being publicly accused of leaking “false stories” to the media in 2019, and after several months of preliminary hearings the libel trial got under way on Tuesday morning.

The wife of former England star Wayne Rooney was dubbed “Wagatha Christie” after publicly claiming Vardy, who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, shared three fake stories, which she posted on her personal Instagram account, with The Sun newspaper.

Rebekah Vardy told Wayne Rooney to ‘**** off’ in seats row – Wagatha Christie trial live

Coleen Rooney, wife of Derby County manager Wayne Rooney arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Britain, May 10, 2022. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls
Image:
Rooney, wife of Derby County manager Wayne Rooney, says she stands by her now infamous social media post

In written submissions to the court, Vardy’s barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC said that while the case has been trivialised as “Wag Wars” it has had a “very profound” impact on her life, leading to “high intensity abuse and vilification”.

However, in written submissions for Rooney, 36, barrister David Sherborne said his client feels “absolutely confident” in the investigation she conducted to find the source of the leaks and that her “authentication was as thorough as many newsrooms”.

Rooney considers Vardy, 40, “fame hungry” and said her husband had to speak to Jamie Vardy about his wife when both footballers were in the England squad in the Euro 2016 tournament in France, due to Rebekah Vardy’s “excessive media activity”, the written statement says.

Under English defamation law, Rooney must prove her post was “substantially true”. The full trial is set to last seven days and follows months of preliminary hearings, with her husband Wayne among those listed to give evidence.

Wayne Rooney appeared alongside his wife in court on Tuesday, but there was no sign of Jamie Vardy during the first day of evidence.

Details of some of the abusive messages sent to Vardy were included in her legal team’s written statement, with one saying: “I hope your baby gets put in a microwave.” Another called Vardy a “dirty rotten sl*g” and an “evil wicked rat face b*tch”, and described her children as “f****** gremlin kids”.

Jamie Vardy was also subjected to chants about his wife during football matches, the court was told.

‘Mrs Vardy is entitled to very substantial award of damages’

Vardy has “endured very high levels of continued public abuse and ridicule”, her legal team said in the written submissions. “While this case has been presented as trivial ‘Wag Wars’, it has had, and continues to have, a very profound impact on Mrs Vardy’s life.

“The allegation made against Mrs Vardy is plainly serious and has been circulated to extraordinary extent, leading to high intensity abuse and vilification… Mrs Vardy is entitled to very substantial award of damages to compensate her for the wrong that has been committed.”

Rooney’s allegation “was and remains false”, Mr Tomlinson’s written argument said. “Mrs Vardy had not leaked information about Mrs Rooney or her friends and family to the Sun newspaper from her private Instagram account.

“Mrs Rooney did not have the ‘irrefutable’ evidence that she claimed to have had: her so-called ‘careful investigation’ was nothing of the sort.

“If anyone had been leaking information from Mrs Rooney’s private Instagram this was not done with Mrs Vardy’s knowledge or approval.”

He continued: “Mrs Vardy made strenuous but unsuccessful attempts to settle the case but the post was not taken down. As result, Mrs Vardy had no choice but to bring this libel action to establish her innocence and vindicate her reputation.”

‘Uncovering the truth was imperative’

Rooney’s post on Twitter has received more than 287,000 “likes”, while on Instagram it has been liked almost 200,000 times.

She is defending the claim on the basis of truth and public interest. Her original allegation against Vardy “is not a very grave one, but it is an important one”, her lawyers say. “The leaks had caused a great deal of upset to [Rooney] as well as others, and so uncovering the truth was imperative.”

The case first went to court in November 2020, with a judge finding at that time that Rooney’s post “clearly identified” Vardy – and not just her account – as being “guilty of the serious and consistent breach of trust”.

Since then, several hearings have taken place to prepare for the trial, including one where texts between Vardy and her agent Caroline Watt emerged.

In the most recent hearing before the trial, the High Court was told by Rooney’s barrister that Vardy now “appears to accept” that Ms Watt was the source of leaked stories.

‘That must be concealment’

In his written argument, Mr Sherborne said there are “numerous examples of the claimant and Ms (Caroline) Watt conspiring to pass private and personal information on to the press about other individuals”.

He continued: “In short, the claimant is someone who has secretly provided, or sought to provide, to the press private information which she has been privy to in relation to a number of individuals in the footballing world or other celebrities, and not just the defendant, without their consent.”

However, in April, the court was told that Ms Watt is not well enough to give evidence at the trial.

The court has also been told by Rooney’s lawyer of “widespread and significant destruction or loss of evidence” in the case, which notably include the loss of Ms Watt’s phone in the North Sea.

“To borrow from Wilde, to lose one significant set of documents may be regarded as a misfortune, to lose two, carelessness, but to lose 10? That must be concealment,” he wrote in his written argument.

Wagatha Christie: The background

Coleen Rooney entertains her kids during the UEFA European Championship 2016; Rebekah Vardy sits behind her. Pic: AP
Image:
Vardy sat behind Rooney, who can be seen entertaining one of her children, during a Euro 2016 match in France. Pic: AP

Rooney accused Vardy of leaking “false stories” about her private life to the media in October 2019, after carrying out a months-long “sting operation” that involved sharing Instagram posts but secretly blocking all but one account – Vardy’s – from seeing them.

The fake stories included Rooney travelling to Mexico for a baby “gender selection” procedure, planning a return to TV, and the basement flooding at her home.

Read more: The Wagatha Christie case explained

“I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them,” Rooney wrote in the internet post that quickly went viral.

“It’s ………. Rebekah Vardy’s account.”

Vardy denies the accusations and is suing Mrs Rooney for libel. The trial before Mrs Justice Steyn continues, with a decision expected in writing at a later date.

football merchandise
The Official Football Merchandise Store
Liverpool
Chelsea
Manchester City
Arsenal
Tottenham Hotspur
Manchester United
Leicester City
Newcastle United
West Ham United
Barcelona
Real Madrid

Source link

Related Posts